Last Wednesday I had the dubious honor of attending the prestreno The Disciple, a English film directed and scripted by Emilio Ruiz Barrachina.
applaud the efforts of the team for making a film in areas Rural Granada, but it is not recommend to anyone. In fact, I advise not to see . Then I comment my opinion on this movie.
applaud the efforts of the team for making a film in areas Rural Granada, but it is not recommend to anyone. In fact, I advise not to see . Then I comment my opinion on this movie.
theme theme (life and death of Jesus Christ) is sufficiently trite as to be difficult to find news in the life of a historical figure who has made rivers of ink and miles of film.
is why I did not expect anything new palpable (and less still a English production). I have not been misguided. brings no gender.
The film is based on the premise that Jesus is a terrorist anti-Roman, a disciple of John the Baptist, which occasionally occur to him sounding phrases. As if this were not enough, her mother (Mary) is bent on messing with Mary Magdalene.
Obviously, to justify that the version of Jesus that has come to us is radically different, facing the Apostles Luke and John arguing about the messianic interpretation of Jesus that is the first. There is also understand that John is not the evangelist Luke weaves a plot for a copyist invent a "gospel of love."
Jesus Christ is presented in a bipolar, proclaiming a Kingdom of God of love but to promote the lifting and the war against Rome.
Of course, all this is sold as "the latest scientific research" to make it easier to swallow. Obviate the fact that there is no assurance that Luke and John write their gospels 100% that a person must have a motivation to lie about facts that have witnessed (fame, shame, money, power) that the tinplate is the time of Jesus and Josephus mentions Jesus as a prophet and not as a liberator.
Jesus also refers to the Hasmonean dynasty (Maccabees) which is not pure speculation. If the hypothesis that Jesus was the son of Joseph carnal is true and it descends from King David , Jesus would be a descendant of the dynasty of it not from the "usurpers" Maccabees. My mistakes
favorites are: the fact that paintings with depth and that Jesus was not born in the year 0.
Finally, pseudo-boobs type Dan Brown.
production
The film is a succession of acts similar to a theater with little or no relationship between them. This makes the movie boring and hard to follow.
There are two completely contrasting styles of music, classical and versions Flemish Christian classical pieces. During the film the music does not match the actions.
When the time you feel like you turn to Jesus and kill him to finish the movie once already. In fact when I catch on the Mount of Olives, which the Romans are instantly ninjas, really funny.
There are two completely contrasting styles of music, classical and versions Flemish Christian classical pieces. During the film the music does not match the actions.
When the time you feel like you turn to Jesus and kill him to finish the movie once already. In fact when I catch on the Mount of Olives, which the Romans are instantly ninjas, really funny.
The corollary
A controversial film about how bad is the issue and mislead the personal, historical research by presenting highly questionable facts. Created to bring since it can not make a difference for its artistic quality.
I'm surprised that Jesus did not leave Scenes of sex with Mary Magdalene (although it is implied they have a sexual encounter ). In fact, the only thing that surprised me.
not worth spending money and time to see it .
I'm surprised that Jesus did not leave Scenes of sex with Mary Magdalene (although it is implied they have a sexual encounter ). In fact, the only thing that surprised me.
not worth spending money and time to see it .
0 comments:
Post a Comment